Pamela Bennett, et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association,, et al
| JAMES DAVIS BENNETT |
| THE JUDGE LAW FIRM, A law corporation, DAVID MANGIKYAN, DOES, 1-10, Inclusive, CIELO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC, JAMES ARTHUR JUDGE and JAMES A. JUDGE |
| PAMELA RAE BENNETT |
| 20-55576 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (SPG, KMW and RDN) [11756384] (QDL) [Entered: 07/17/2020 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Joseph v. Office of the Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1028 (9th Cir. 1987) (district courts grant of motion to set aside default judgment is not final, appealable order). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11733606] (JMR) [Entered: 06/25/2020 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett motion to stay appellate proceedings. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/15/2020. [11727966] (QDL) [Entered: 06/19/2020 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/12/2020. [11723746] (QDL) [Entered: 06/16/2020 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett opening brief due 08/04/2020. Appellees Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc, Does, James Arthur Judge, David Mangikyan and The Judge Law Firm answering brief due 09/04/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11708502] (RT) [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
