Joseph Dang v. David Pontier, et al
| GLENN C. NUSBAUM, PAUL E. KIM, TEOCO CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation, KEVIN YOO, PAUL E. KIM, MD INC. and UMR INC., a Deleware Corporation |
| DAVID PONTIER, an individual |
| JOSEPH DANG, an individual, DBA Law Office of Joseph Dang |
| 20-55712 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, MMS and CMC) [11789788] (RR) [Entered: 08/14/2020 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11764220] (AF) [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Pontier opening brief due 09/16/2020. Appellee Joseph Dang answering brief due 10/16/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11751123] (RT) [Entered: 07/13/2020 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
