Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Scott v. Yoo et al
as 3:2021cv01319
Plaintiff:
Billie D. Scott
Defendant:
Frank Kevin Yoo, M.D. and Tri City Medical Center/Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pontier v. GEICO Insurance et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Farmers Inc, Joseph Dang, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
David Pontier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac
Joseph Dang v. David Pontier, et al
as 21-55032
Counter Claimant:
DAVID PONTIER, an individual
Defendant:
TEOCO CORPORATION GROUP BENEFIT PLAN, a self funded group health plan, PAUL E. KIM, MD INC., a California corporation, TEOCO CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
GLENN C. NUSBAUM, PAUL E. KIM and KEVIN YOO
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANG, an individual, DBA Law Office of Joseph Dang
Pontier v. GEICO Insurance et al
as 2:2020cv01446
Defendant:
Farmers Inc, Joseph Dang, PHIA Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Pontier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Dang v. David Pontier, et al
as 20-55712
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID PONTIER, an individual
Defendant:
GLENN C. NUSBAUM, PAUL E. KIM, TEOCO CORPORATION, a Deleware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH DANG, an individual, DBA Law Office of Joseph Dang
Dang v. Pontier et al
as 3:2019cv01519
Defendant:
UMR Inc., TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, David Pontier and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dang and Joseph Dang an individual doing business as Law Office of Joseph Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Dang v Pontier et al
as 3:2018cv01869
Defendant:
Smoke Ranch Surgery Center, LLC, CFA, LLC, UMR Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dang and Joseph Dang an individual doing business as Law Office of Joseph Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Yoo v. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02928
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hineline, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., Sharon Mates and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Yoo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
