Adam Darrenkamp v. Doug Ducey, et al
| ADAM DARRENKAMP |
| DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent |
| 21-16101 |
| June 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): On July 19, 2021, this court entered an order dismissing this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on August 9, 2021. The motion for reconsideration remains pending. On August 16, 2021, the district court entered a final judgment. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the August 16, 2021 final judgment. Appellants motion for reconsideration will be addressed by separate order. [12205431] (CKP) [Entered: 08/19/2021 01:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 08/16/2021 notice of dismissal. [12202729] (DJV) [Entered: 08/16/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Adam Darrenkamp motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 07/19/2021. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/01/2021. [12196002] (DJV) [Entered: 08/09/2021 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12175902] (AF) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Adam Darrenkamp motion to update noa. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/08/2021. [12171175] (DJV) [Entered: 07/13/2021 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/01/2021 30 days to file an amended complaint [12161849] (DJV) [Entered: 07/02/2021 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adam Darrenkamp opening brief due 08/27/2021. Appellees Doug Ducey and State of Arizona answering brief due 09/27/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12158668] (JPD) [Entered: 06/30/2021 08:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
