Joseph Anderson v. James Dzurenda, et al
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON |
JAMES DZURENDA, IAN E. CARR, K. THOMAS, JAMES GREG COX, SHERYL FOSTER, E. K. MCDANIEL, HAROLD WICKHAM, QUINTIN BYRNE, RENEE BAKER, Warden, TARA CARPENTER, WILLIAM SANDIE, VALAREE OLIVOS, DAVID CARPENTER, TIM GARRET, BATISTA, DWAYNE BAZE, B. RUTHERFORD, RAY EAST, SUSAN BAROS, JEFFRY CHANDLER, BECKERDITE, JETHRO PARKS, GILBERTO FILORIO-RAMIREZ, PAMELA FEIL, M. GILDER, ANTHONY R. CARRASCO, JAMES STAGNER, RICHARD SNYDER, SCOTT DAVIS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON, CATHERINE YUPP, DESIREE HULTENSCHMIDT, RUSSELL DONNELLY, KATHERINE HEGGE, STEVE BALLENTINE, J. WALSH, CORALEE GORSLINE, A. FEATHER, SHERI L. GENTRY, B. CARTHEN, V. AUSTIN, N. CORDOVA, C. LANGLEY, R. KIENENBERGER, LIMA, ROGER TERRANCE, WILLIAM KABLITZ, DOMINICK MARTUCCI and WALTER LIMA-HERNANDEZ |
21-16549 |
September 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
JOSEPH ANDERSON V. JAMES DZURENDA |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW):Appellees motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) is granted. The answering brief is now due December 16, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12293240] (OC) [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:56 AM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellees Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, V. Austin, Renee Baker, Susan Baros, Batista, Quintin Byrne, David Carpenter, Tara Carpenter, Ian E. Carr, Anthony R. Carrasco, Jeffry Chandler, N. Cordova, James Greg Cox, Scott Davis, Russell Donnelly, James Dzurenda, A. Feather, Pamela Feil, Gilberto Filorio-Ramirez, Sheryl Foster, Tim Garret, Coralee Gorsline, Katherine Hegge, Desiree Hultenschmidt, William Kablitz, Walter Lima-Hernandez, Dominick Martucci, E. K. McDaniel, Valaree Olivos, William Sandie, Richard Snyder, James Stagner, Roger Terrance, K. Thomas, J. Walsh, Harold Wickham and Catherine Yupp Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 12/16/2021. Date of service: 11/16/2021. [12289011] [21-16549] (Zunino, Gregory) [Entered: 11/16/2021 01:46 PM] |
Filing 9 Attorneys Douglas Reed Rands substituted by Attorneys Gregory L. Zunino [12284365] (JFF) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:37 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gregory L. Zunino (Nevada Office of the Attorney General, 100 N. Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada 89701) for Appellees Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, V. Austin, Renee Baker, Susan Baros, Batista, Dwayne Baze, Quintin Byrne, David Carpenter, Tara Carpenter, Ian E. Carr, Anthony R. Carrasco, Jeffry Chandler, N. Cordova, James Greg Cox, Scott Davis, Russell Donnelly, James Dzurenda, A. Feather, Pamela Feil, Gilberto Filorio-Ramirez, Sheryl Foster, Tim Garret, Coralee Gorsline, Katherine Hegge, Desiree Hultenschmidt, William Kablitz, Walter Lima-Hernandez, Dominick Martucci, E. K. McDaniel, Valaree Olivos, William Sandie, Richard Snyder, James Stagner, Roger Terrance, K. Thomas, J. Walsh, Harold Wickham and Catherine Yupp. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Douglas Reed Rands, Esquire for Appellees Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, V. Austin, Renee Baker, Susan Baros, Batista, Dwayne Baze, Quintin Byrne, David Carpenter, Tara Carpenter, Ian E. Carr, Anthony R. Carrasco, Jeffry Chandler, N. Cordova, James Greg Cox, Scott Davis, Russell Donnelly, James Dzurenda, A. Feather, Pamela Feil, Gilberto Filorio-Ramirez, Sheryl Foster, Tim Garret, Coralee Gorsline, Katherine Hegge, Desiree Hultenschmidt, William Kablitz, Lima, Walter Lima-Hernandez, Dominick Martucci, E. K. McDaniel, Valaree Olivos, William Sandie, Richard Snyder, James Stagner, Roger Terrance, K. Thomas, J. Walsh, Harold Wickham and Catherine Yupp. Date of service: 11/10/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12284311] [21-16549] (Zunino, Gregory) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:18 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed order (SANDRA S. IKUTA and JOHN B. OWENS) Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief remains due November 16, 2021. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because the pro se appellant has not filed excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. [12281191] (OC) [Entered: 11/08/2021 12:40 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Joseph M. Anderson motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12260664] (JFF) [Entered: 10/18/2021 04:56 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Joseph M. Anderson opening brief of 14 pages (Informal: No). Served on 10/12/2021. [12260126] (KT) [Entered: 10/18/2021 02:19 PM] |
Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12253875] (CKP) [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:16 PM] |
Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated. [Case Number 21-16549: Partially Paid] [12253800] (JFF) [Entered: 10/12/2021 11:54 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The appeal filed September 20, 2021 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The briefing schedule shall be established as follows: appellants opening brief is due October 19, 2021; appellees answering brief is due November 16, 2021; and appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The appeal and any motions pending at the time briefing is completed shall be referred to the next available motions panel for disposition. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellant's forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellant's account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellant's institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellant's trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will send a prisoner authorization form to appellant along with this order. [12236670] (CKP) [Entered: 09/23/2021 08:51 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12234725] (RT) [Entered: 09/21/2021 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.