Jamisi Calloway v. Ronald Davis, et al
| JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY |
| RONALD DAVIS, Warden, A. W. DEEMS, E. TOOTELL, M. ROWE, D. WU, DAVITA INC., SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL, TERESA, Davita Registered Nurse and DEBBIE, Davita Supervisor |
| 21-16638 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| JAMISI CALLOWAY V. RONALD DAVIS, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway letter dated re: case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12300947] (JFF) [Entered: 11/30/2021 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway Form 28. Response to Motion or Court Order. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12297557] (JFF) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellees Ronald Davis, A. W. Deems, E. Tootell, M. Rowe and D. Wu reply to response (). Date of service: 11/18/2021. [12291276] [21-16638] (Tartaglio, Anthony) [Entered: 11/18/2021 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway FORM 28 response to motion or court order. Served on 11/02/2021. [12280188] (RL) [Entered: 11/05/2021 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway motion for proof of payment. Deficiencies: None. [12277429] (JFF) [Entered: 11/03/2021 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees M. Rowe, E. Tootell, D. Wu, A. W. Deems and Ronald Davis response to motion ([ # 6 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 11/02/2021. [12276423] [21-16638] (Tartaglio, Anthony) [Entered: 11/02/2021 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 10 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 11/01/2021. [12275545] (RT) [Entered: 11/02/2021 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway Form 28. Response to Motion or Court order. [12272079] (JFF) [Entered: 10/28/2021 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees Ronald Davis, A. W. Deems, M. Rowe, E. Tootell and D. Wu Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Hold Appeal in Abeyance Pending Resolution of Post-Judgment Motion]. Date of service: 10/28/2021. [12271942] [21-16638] (Tartaglio, Anthony) [Entered: 10/28/2021 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 10/22/2021. [12267597] (JR) [Entered: 10/25/2021 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway motion for notice of admissible evidence. Deficiencies: None. [12267299] (JFF) [Entered: 10/25/2021 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12267296] (JFF) [Entered: 10/25/2021 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway letter dated re: Form 29. Request for Docket Sheet, Document, or Rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12267290] (JFF) [Entered: 10/25/2021 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12267277] (JFF) [Entered: 10/25/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12256868] (CKP) [Entered: 10/14/2021 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jamisi Jermaine Calloway opening brief due 12/03/2021. Appellees Ronald Davis, et al answering brief due 01/03/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12249018] (JPD) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
