Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Travis King, et al v. Demichael Dews, et al
as 22-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS SCOTT KING, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Breana Raymundo and BREANNA RAYMUNDO
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMICHAEL DEWS, CALVIN NEE and JOHN TRAN
Defendant:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Patricia Polanco, et al v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-15496
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PATRICIA POLANCO, VINCENT POLANCO, SELENA POLANCO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RALPH DIAZ, ESTATE OF ROBERT S. THARRATT, RONALD DAVIS, Warden and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON and others
Michael Hampton, et al v. State of California, et al
as 22-15481
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL HAMPTON and JACQUELINE HAMPTON
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON and others
Michael Jace v. Ronald Davis
as 22-55241
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW JACE
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Jamisi Calloway v. Ronald Davis, et al
as 21-16638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, A. W. DEEMS, E. TOOTELL and others
Michael Jace v. Ronald Davis
as 21-55915
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW JACE
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Robert Lewis, Jr. v. Ronald Davis
as 20-56414
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT LEWIS, Jr.
Troy Smith v. Ronald Davis
as 20-17037
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY SMITH
Anthony Oliver v. Ronald Davis
as 20-99000
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. OLIVER
Respondent:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Earnest Woods, II v. Ronald Davis
as 20-70122
Petitioner:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Respondent:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
