Paul Johnson v. Ron Davis, et al
| PAUL DAVID JOHNSON |
| RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN, R. BROOMFIELD, J. KNIGHT, A. CUEVAS, D. ERNST, DEPUTY K. JACKSON, A. BROOKS, J. WILLON, M. BROWN, C. SAMANANL, R. MARTINEZ, E. REYES, P. HOANG, S. TIN, C. SANTIAGO, Y. GONZALEZ, C. COLLINS, J. SANDHU, T. WILLIAMS, R. GARDEA, G. FORNCOOK, S. LEDESMA, R. BOEGER and C. KERY |
| 21-17050 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed original and 1 copy of Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief of 13 pages (page numbered 10 not provided) (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/03/2022. [12333564] (LA) [Entered: 01/06/2022 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee R. Boeger Correspondence: Letter to the Court. Date of service: 12/20/2021 [12321139] [21-17050] (Wu, Oliver) [Entered: 12/20/2021 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12315748] (CKP) [Entered: 12/14/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Paul David Johnson opening brief due 02/11/2022. Appellees T. Allen, R. Boeger, A. Brooks, R. Broomfield, M. Brown, C. Collins, A. Cuevas, Ron Davis, D. Ernst, G. Forncook, R. Gardea, Y. Gonzalez, P. Hoang, K. Jackson, C. Kery, J. Knight, S. Ledesma, R. Martinez, E. Reyes, C. Samananl, J. Sandhu, C. Santiago, S. Tin, T. Williams and J. Willon answering brief due 03/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12315128] (JMR) [Entered: 12/14/2021 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
