Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Stanley v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mark Stanley
Defendant:
CDCR, San Quentin State Prison, R. Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Poye-Perez v. Diaz et al
as 3:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Serguey Poye-Perez
Defendant:
R Diaz, K Allison, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Sanchez, et al
as 23-15145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, BOISE, Lieutenant and R. BROOMFIELD
Johnson v. Spurgeon et al
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
D. Spurgeon, N. Avila, A. Pachynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sanchez, Lieutenant Boise and R. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Watson v. Allison et al
as 5:2022cv04522
Plaintiff:
Rhone Watson
Defendant:
CDCR, CCHCS, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
