Maxwell Joelson v. David Sultzbaugh
| MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON |
| CHIEF U.S. PROBATION OFFICER DAVID J. SULTZBAUGH, For the Southern District of California |
| 21-55440 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/30/2020 the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability [12159627] (JFF) [Entered: 06/30/2021 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to waive additional copies and mailing requirements from order dated 06/04/2021]. Date of service: 06/04/2021. [12134225]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [7].] (SLM) [Entered: 06/04/2021 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 8 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson Correspondence: seeking a waiver on the additional copies and mailing requirements from order dated 06/04/2021. Date of service: 06/04/2021 [12134182] [21-55440] (Joelson, Maxwell) [Entered: 06/04/2021 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 4 ] submitted by Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 5 ] submitted by Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12133675] (KT) [Entered: 06/04/2021 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson. Date of service: 05/26/2021. [12133668]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [ # 4 ].] (KT) [Entered: 06/04/2021 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson. Date of service: 05/26/2021. [12126113] [21-55440]--[COURT UPDATE: removed PDF of excerpts of record, re-entered correctly in entry [ # 5 ]. 06/04/2021 by KT] (Joelson, Maxwell) [Entered: 05/26/2021 07:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Maxwell Rangel Joelson Motion to take judicial notice of COA IS NOT APPLICABLE IN THIS 2241 APPEAL---SEE OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT THAT A COA IS NOT REQUIRED DUE TO JOELSON'S "USUAL" POST-TRIAL POSTURE. Date of service: 05/26/2021. [12126111] [21-55440] (Joelson, Maxwell) [Entered: 05/26/2021 07:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (Interim Appellate Commissioner): This case is remanded for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to grant or deny a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997); Porter v. Adams, 244 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2001) (certificate of appealability required where 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition attacks conviction or sentence, even if it was not construed as section 2255 motion by district court). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue or issues meet the required showing; if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court is requested to state its reasons. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court judge. (Pro Se) [12124682] (CKP) [Entered: 05/26/2021 06:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Maxwell Rangel Joelson opening brief due 06/30/2021. Appellee David J. Sultzbaugh answering brief due 07/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12099976] (JMR) [Entered: 05/03/2021 01:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Maxwell Joelson v. David Sultzbaugh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON | |
| Represented By: | Maxwell Rangel Joelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: CHIEF U.S. PROBATION OFFICER DAVID J. SULTZBAUGH, For the Southern District of California | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Earl Zipp |
| Represented By: | Amy B. Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
