Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Maxwell Joelson, et al v. USA
as 22-55122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON, And On Behalf of All others Similarly situated and JUAN VALDEZ, And On Behalf of All others Similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxwell Joelson v. David Sultzbaugh
as 21-55440
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHIEF U.S. PROBATION OFFICER DAVID J. SULTZBAUGH, For the Southern District of California
Maxwell Joelson v. USA
as 21-55316
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Maxwell Joelson v. USDC-CALA
as 19-71776
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Petitioner:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Maxwell Joelson v. DOJ, et al
as 18-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DANIEL LEVIN and GONZALO P. CURIEL
Maxwell Joelson v. DOJ, et al
as 18-55366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DANIEL LEVIN and GONZALO P. CURIEL
Maxwell Joelson v. USA
as 17-55733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxwell Joelson v. USDC-CALA
as 16-73084
:
In re: MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Petitioner:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxwell Joelson v. USA
as 14-56026
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Maxwell Joelson v. USA
as 12-57321
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
