Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
| KEVIN E. MOORE |
| PRICE, PARSONS, WALLS, BELL, DEN DULK, R. MARQUEZ, G. NIES, C. GAMBLE, JOSEPH BEASLEY, C. HAMMOND, J. A. ZAMORA and K. POOL |
| 22-15682 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Attorney Tiffany Johnson in 22-15682 substituted by Attorney Daniel Mark Jackson in 22-15682 [12483101] (NAC) [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Mark Jackson (Office of the California Attorney General, 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102) for Appellees Bell, Parsons and Walls. Substitution for Attorney Mrs. Tiffany Johnson for Appellees Bell, Parsons and Walls. Date of service: 06/29/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12483089] [22-15682] (Jackson, Daniel) [Entered: 06/29/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion to extend time to file In Forma Pauperis and response to Court order. Deficiencies: None. [12481408] (NAC) [Entered: 06/28/2022 07:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request by Appellant Kevin E. Moore to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12481014] (JN) [Entered: 06/27/2022 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore supplemental motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12479481] (NAC) [Entered: 06/24/2022 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received Appellant Kevin E. Moore notice regarding Certified Statement Document. [12479475] (NAC) [Entered: 06/24/2022 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12477090] (NAC) [Entered: 06/22/2022 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12477087] (NAC) [Entered: 06/22/2022 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the March 30, 2022 magistrate judge order challenged in the notice of appeal may not be final or appealable. See In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); see also Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017) (all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent in order for jurisdiction to vest with the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1)); Columbia Record Productions v. Hot Wax Records, Inc., 966 F.2d 515, 516-17 (9th Cir. 1992) (holding that absent consent, a federal magistrate judge lacked authority to render a post-judgment decision that has a dispositive effect on the parties). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or remanded to the district court. See Allen v. Meyer, 755 F.3d 866, 867 (9th Cir. 2014). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12474485] (JMR) [Entered: 06/17/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received Appellant Kevin E. Moore notice regarding exhibits. [12439308] (NAC) [Entered: 05/05/2022 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin E. Moore opening brief due 07/07/2022. Appellees Joseph Beasley, Bell, Den Dulk, C. Gamble, C. Hammond, R. Marquez, G. Nies, Parsons, K. Pool, Price, Walls and J. A. Zamora answering brief due 08/08/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12439018] (RT) [Entered: 05/05/2022 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
