Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kilhoffer v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2026cv02361
Defendant:
E. Carter, S. Barkley, Eboni Price and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kilhoffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner #624156 v. Price et al
as 1:2026cv03227
Defendant:
Unknown Parties #2, Unknown Parties #1 and Luis Price
Plaintiff:
Derek Evan Gardner #624156
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv05666
Defendant:
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS L.P., individually and as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, indivdually and as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, NATIONAL FOAM, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reis, Daniel Reinstetle, Mary Reinking-Ellinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
REDLAWSK et al v. LUTNICK et al
as 1:2026cv03976
Defendant:
KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, GEORGE M. COOK and HOWARD W. LUTNICK
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. PRICE and DAVID P. REDLAWSK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chenel Derousseau v. Akinyooye Adetokunbo, et al
as 26-14165
Defendant:
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COIN LAUNDRY, KIMBERLY MACK and others
Plaintiff:
CHENEL DEROUSSEAU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv07198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRICE v. AWP, INC.
as 1:2026cv02358
Defendant:
AWP, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICOLE PRICE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
