Carl Edwards v. Nevada, State of, et al
| CARL D. EDWARDS |
| NEVADA, STATE OF, GITTERE, ESP Warden, FORD, Nevada Attorney General, RIVERA, Caseworker Unit 4-A-B, DRUMMOND, ESP Warden, SANDAVOLL-COOK, JACKSON, ROMAN, BELTRENA and MCCARTTIE |
| 22-16589 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMM, KMW and WAF) [12598685] (RL) [Entered: 11/30/2022 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 Mail returned on 11/28/2022 addressed to Carl D. Edwards, re: [ # 2 ] Dispositive Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, offender refused, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; appellant refused mail. (Per the Nevada Department of Corrections website, appellant is still located at Ely State Prison.) [12598442] (QDL) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12583082] (RT) [Entered: 11/08/2022 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carl D. Edwards opening brief due 12/12/2022. [12564729] (JMR) [Entered: 10/17/2022 10:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
