Cases 1 - 10 of 100
POWELL v. JACKSON
as 5:2026cv00520
Respondent:
WARDEN WENDY JACKSON
Petitioner:
SHARMILA MELISSA POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv13575
Defendant:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Karen Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jackson, Ronnie v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv01088
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Columbus Township et al
as 2:2026cv14211
Defendant:
Robert Osterman, Roland Suess and Columbus Township
Plaintiff:
Scott Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Jackson
as 1:2026cv00517
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Plaintiff:
Samuel James Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Restricted Filer - Matthew Leo Jackson Faison, Jr. Litigation
as 1:2026mc27778
Unknown:
Restricted Filer - Matthew Leo Jackson Faison, Jr. Litigation
JACKSON v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 7:2026cv00345
Defendant:
DEPUTY JOSH PARKER, DEPUTY A J PARKER and LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
LYDIA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. The State of Ohio et al
as 1:2026cv01121
Defendant:
Cincinnati Police Department, Hamilton County Prosecutors, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
