Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Roger Jackson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beauchene et al
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Baeuchene, Tristan-j-Van-de-Streek, Mark A. Beauchene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cass County Court et al
as 1:2021cv00207
Petitioner:
Roger Jackson
Respondent:
Cass County Court and North Dakota State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gourneau et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Spotted Bear, Jordan Gunderson, Dennis G. Nash and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Spirit Lake Tribe et al v. Jaeger
as 1:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Clark Peltier, Spirit Lake Tribe, Leslie Peltier and others
Defendant:
Alvin Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2018cv00153
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Terrell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2018cv00066
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrance C. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Slawson Exploration Company, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Slawson Exploration Company, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior , Ryan Zinke , Interior Board of Land Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00223
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrance C. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
