Randall Allen v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| RANDALL BERNARD ALLEN |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHEL MOORE, LAPD, ALEX VILLANUEVA, LASD, ERIC GARCETTI, LA Mayor, GAVIN NEWSOM, CA Governor, UNKNOWN and DOES, 1-10 inclusive |
| 22-55260 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 22-6367 Filed on: 11/28/2022 Cert Petition Action 1: Denied, 02/21/2023 [12658410] (JFF) [Entered: 02/22/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 17 Supreme Court Case Info Case number: 22-6367 Filed on: 11/28/2022 Cert Petition Action 1: Pending [12616432] (RL) [Entered: 12/22/2022 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 16 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, SPG and MJB) [12581411] (RL) [Entered: 11/07/2022 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed Appellant Randall Bernard Allen motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 10/14/2022. Deficiencies: NAN per 10/14/22 order. Served on: No service date. Sent copy of order and docket sheet. [12576562] (BJK) [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, SUSAN P. GRABER and MARK J. BENNETT) The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). On April 12, 2022, this court ordered appellant to explain in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). Upon a review of the record, the response to the courts April 12, 2022 order, and the opening brief, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [12563318] (OC) [Entered: 10/14/2022 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Randall Bernard Allen certificate of interested entities or persons. Dated 08/28/2022. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12531974] (RL) [Entered: 09/01/2022 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 12 Received Appellant Randall Bernard Allen Affidavit. [12490959] (NAC) [Entered: 07/11/2022 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Randall Bernard Allen opening brief of 29 pages (Informal: No). Served on 05/10/2022. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Filed with minor deficiencies: no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. (Briefing remains stayed) [12443456] (SML) [Entered: 05/10/2022 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Randall Bernard Allen statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 04/19/2022. [12431922] (RL) [Entered: 04/26/2022 05:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Michael Martin Walsh for party(s) Appellee Eric Garcetti. [12431066] (RL) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 8 Attorney Cory Michael Brente substituted by Attorney Michael Martin Walsh. [12431051] (RL) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael M. Walsh (Los Angeles City Attorneys Office, 200 N. Spring Street, 14th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellees City of Los Angeles and Eric Garcetti. Substitution for Attorney Cory Michael Brente for Appellee City of Los Angeles. Date of service: 04/26/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12431035] [22-55260] (Walsh, Michael) [Entered: 04/26/2022 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and is frivolous, and has denied appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on March 30, 2022, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. All pending motions will be addressed after disposition of this order to show cause. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12419111] (CKP) [Entered: 04/12/2022 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Randall Bernard Allen opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 03/30/2022. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Filed with minor deficiencies: no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. (motion to proceed IFP and appointment of counsel pending, the briefing schedule remains stayed) [12408224] (KWG) [Entered: 03/30/2022 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Randall Bernard Allen motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12408147] (JFF) [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Randall Bernard Allen motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12408145] (JFF) [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/15/2022 ORDER. Order on motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis: 28 USC 753(f), 28 USC 1915. The court has considered the motion and the motion is DENIED. The Court certifies that the proposed appeal is not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) and is frivolous, without merit and does not present a substantial question within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 753(f). [12397040] (RL) [Entered: 03/16/2022 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Randall Bernard Allen opening brief due 05/09/2022. Appellees City of Los Angeles and Gavin Newsom answering brief due 06/07/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12393532] (HH) [Entered: 03/14/2022 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
