Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bryant v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00542
Plaintiff:
Keiron W. Bryant
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2026cv01536
Plaintiff:
Mark C Jackson
Defendant:
State of Florida, United States of America and Unknown Goverment Racketeering Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04129
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. Unknown
as 2:2026cv00596
Plaintiff:
Keith Bell
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yates v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00538
Plaintiff:
Demetrus T. Yates
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solano v. Cochise County Jail et al
as 4:2026cv00302
Plaintiff:
Maria Isela Encinas Solano
Defendant:
Cochise County Jail, Unknown Parties and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2026cv04095
Plaintiff:
Kelly Vanessa Woods
Defendant:
Chandler, City of, Chandler Police Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Norman v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2026cv06856
Plaintiff:
Marcus Norman
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, City of Chicago Department of Finance, City of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
