Hanh Do v. Arch Insurance Company, et al
HANH THI MY DO |
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES, 1-20 |
TWIN TOWN TREATMENT CENTERS ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP PMA COMPANIES, BOA, CITY OF IRVINE, STEPHEN MIKULAK, CHARLES F. NETTELS,FREEBURG AND NETTELS LAW, CHASE and ACTION LIFE PROPERTY, PMA COMPANIES |
22-55762 |
August 12, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Motor Vehicle |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 5, 2022 order challenged in the August 11, 2022 notice of appeal was not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A review of the record reflects that the district court entered final judgment on August 16, 2022. Appellants appeal of the August 16, 2022 judgment remains pending as appeal No. 22-55860. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12547390] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2022 04:45 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do writ of mandamus of the Court Rules, complaint for declatory relief in the nature of mandamus. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/11/2022. [12544517] (RL) [Entered: 09/20/2022 12:12 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do response to order to show cause (document titled: correspondence to Hon. Court 9/1/2022 letter notice of appeal for the jury trial). Served on 09/08/2022. [12537915] (RL) [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:25 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal filed on August 11, 2022, because it appears the August 5, 2022 order challenged in the appeal was not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. All pending motions will be addressed after disposition of this order to show cause. A review of the record reflects that, to date, appellant has not filed a new notice of appeal of the district courts final judgment entered on August 16, 2022. [12532205] (CKP) [Entered: 09/01/2022 04:58 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do motion for immediate stay the entire actions of the District Court case for further gudiance and order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/15/2022. [12521666] (RL) [Entered: 08/19/2022 03:45 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Hanh Thi My Do opening brief due 10/11/2022. Appellees Action Life Property, PMA Companies, Arch Insurance Company, BOA, Charles F. Nettels,Freeburg and Nettels Law, Chase, City of Irvine, Does, Stephen Mikulak and Twin Town Treatment Centers Arch Insurance Company York Risk Services Group PMA Companies answering brief due 11/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12516327] (RT) [Entered: 08/12/2022 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.