Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25,104
Henry v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv04489
Plaintiff: Gina Henry
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Agricultural Chemical Solutions, Inc. et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv01261
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: Bogumila Kopczynski and Agricultural Chemical Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 3:2024mc00061
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: J P Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv01287
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Sadaf Zadeh, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: Marcia Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
CHASE v. ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Defendant: GORDON THAMES, ARBOR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT INC and JILL HEWITT
Plaintiff: LINDA C CHASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
CHASE v ST. JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: LINDA C CHASE
Defendant: CARMEN WORLEY, MARY MATOS-WEATHERS and ST JOE COMPANY/SJSA LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Chase v. Russell
as 24-1965
Respondent: Superintendent EILEEN RUSSELL
Petitioner: ROSE CHASE
USA v. Chase Curry
as 24-12343
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHASE DONTRAY CURRY
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2024cv00514
Defendant: Zera Augustus Rowley, Travis Marvin Kenison, Juab County and others
Plaintiff: Clay James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2024cv00515
Defendant: Juab County, Chase Nathan Oliver, Travis Marvin Kenison and others
Plaintiff: Clay James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?