Cases 1 - 10 of 51
McMorris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Jason McMorris
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Block Inc. doing business as Cash App
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoppes v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 4:2019cv03072
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Tim & Teresa Hoppes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Chase
as 8:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Richard Otto Hansen
Defendant:
Jana M. Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $588,453.25 in United States Currency in Bank of America Account Number x8909 in the Name of James Dunbar et al
as 8:2019cv00164
Defendant:
$44,810.33 in United States Currency in First Republic Bank Account Number x2996 in the name of Ashton B Vines, $859,049.90 in United States Currency in JP Morgan Chase Account Number x8305 in the Name of Vines Investments Inc., $588,453.25 in United States Currency in Bank of America Account Number x8909 in the Name of James Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Henderson State Bank
as 4:2018cv03171
Defendant:
Henderson State Bank
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv05007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
