Hanh Do v. Arch Insurance Company, et al
HANH THI MY DO |
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES, 1-20 |
TWIN TOWN TREATMENT CENTERS ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP PMA COMPANIES, BOA, CITY OF IRVINE, CHARLES F. NETTELS,FREEBURG AND NETTELS LAW, STEPHEN MIKULAK, CHASE and ACTION LIFE PROPERTY, PMA COMPANIES |
22-55860 |
September 20, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Motor Vehicle |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
HANH DO V. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Amended Motion to extend time to file Opening brief. Date of service: 11/18/2022. [12591219] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [9] .] (TYL) [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:09 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Motion to extend time to file Opening brief. Date of service: 11/18/2022. [12591207] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [8] .] (TYL) [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:04 PM] |
Filing 9 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 11 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 11/18/2022. [12591174] [22-55860] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/18/2022 11:50 AM] |
Filing 8 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do response to Court order dated 11/18/2022. Date of service: 11/18/2022. [12591136] [22-55860] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/18/2022 11:38 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Correspondence: thank you letter. Date of service: 11/13/2022. [12585546] [22-55860]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 11/14/2022 by SLM] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/13/2022 12:57 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Correspondence: JUDGMENTS 22-55762 HAD BEEN ENTERS PER JUDICIAL REVIEW, STRIKING REQUIRES HON JUSTICES SIGNATURES FOR VERIFICATIONS. JUDGMENTS UNDER STIPULATIONS CAN NOT BE STRIKED FROM STATE COURT RECORDS, MOTION HAD BEEN PROCEEDED FOR THOSE JUDGMENTS CAN NOT BE STRIKED. Date of service: 11/12/2022 [12585543] [22-55860] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/12/2022 10:26 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Correspondence: Appellant's Informal Brief for the appeal 22-55860 into 2 sections: 1) writ of mandamus 2,3 for default judgment of Arch discrimination 12/2/2015 and bad faith 11/30/2016 2) Appeal of the abrupt jury trial cancellation without advance notice (con 7). Date of service: 11/11/2022 [12585527] [22-55860] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/11/2022 07:06 PM] |
Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/11/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12585526]. [22-55860] (AD) [Entered: 11/11/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Correspondence: District Court documents. Date of service: 11/11/2022. [12585517] [22-55860]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 11/14/2022 by SLM] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/11/2022 03:57 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Miss Hanh Thi My Do Correspondence: judgments of mandate. Date of service: 11/11/2022. [12585504] [22-55860]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 11/14/2022 by SLM] (Do, Hanh) [Entered: 11/11/2022 12:43 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Hanh Thi My Do opening brief due 11/22/2022. Appellees Action Life Property, PMA Companies, Arch Insurance Company, BOA, Charles F. Nettels,Freeburg and Nettels Law, Chase, City of Irvine, Does, Stephen Mikulak and Twin Town Treatment Centers Arch Insurance Company York Risk Services Group PMA Companies answering brief due 12/22/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12545077] (RT) [Entered: 09/20/2022 04:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.