Singh v. Garland
| RANJIT SINGH |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-577 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SINGH V. GARLAND |
| SINGH V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Carlos T. BEA, Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 34 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2023 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 33 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Robert Bradford Jobe for Petitioner Ranjit Singh. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 3 in San Francisco, on 10/16/2023 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/02/2023 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 32 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Michael Christopher Heyse for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/05/2023 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 31 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Michael Christopher Heyse for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/05/2023 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Christopher Heyse for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/05/2023 06:16 AM] |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Monday, October 16, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-577] [Entered: 08/06/2023 06:22 AM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please consult with opposing counsel and review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-577] [Entered: 07/13/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for October 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [22-577] [Entered: 06/22/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:50 PM] |
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/13/2023 12:26 PM]
|
| Filing 24 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:51 AM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Respondents motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due February 13, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/19/2022 04:48 PM]
|
| Filing 22 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/08/2022 09:03 AM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 20) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 12/14/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:04 PM]
|
| Filing 20 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Ranjit Singh received. [Entered: 10/07/2022 11:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Sara Bayram for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 01:41:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sara Bayram for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 07:51:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sara Bayram for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 07:49:00 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Ranjit Singh is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/16/2022 09:32:00 AM]
|
| Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Ranjit Singh. [Entered: 09/15/2022 07:38:00 PM] [Edited: 09/16/2022 09:30:00 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 15, 2022. The answering brief is due November 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/01/2022 10:12:00 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Ranjit Singh. [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:23:00 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 31, 2022. The answering brief is due October 31, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/08/2022 10:51:00 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Ranjit Singh. [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:29:45 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/1/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/30/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/30/2022 10:06:00 AM]
|
| Filing 8 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Ranjit Singh. [Entered: 06/29/2022 05:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:44:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Jonathan Kevin Ross for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Kevin Ross for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2022 07:34:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/2/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/1/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 8/30/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/28/2022 01:19:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/28/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-577 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/28/2022 01:18:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/3/2022. [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:25:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:24:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RANJIT SINGH | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Robert Bradford Jobe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Sara Bayram |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. Michael Christopher Heyse |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Kevin Ross |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
