Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Singh v. Garland
as 23-2065
Petitioner:
RANJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 23-1101
Petitioner:
RANJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GS Holistic, LLC v. Blueberry Rental LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Blueberry Rental LLC Doing business as Blueberry Vape & Smoke, Shehnaz Bal, Ranjit Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Bluebells Ranch LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Bluebells Ranch LLC Doing business as Bluebells Vape and Smoke, Ranjit Singh and Shehnaz Bal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Blueberry Rental LLC d/b/a Blueberry Vape & Smoke et al
as 2:2022at01153
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Blueberry Rental LLC d/b/a Blueberry Vape & Smoke, Shehnaz Bal, Ranjit Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Bluebells Ranch LLC d/b/a Bluebells Vape and Smoke et al
as 2:2022at01152
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Bluebells Ranch LLC d/b/a Bluebells Vape and Smoke, Ranjit Singh and Shehnaz Bal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MCQUEEN v. SINGH et al
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MCQUEEN
Defendant:
RANJIT SINGH and AJ DHILLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
