Matthew Houston v. Jerry Howell, et al
| MATTHEW HOUSTON and MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON |
| JERRY HOWELL, Warden, LT. CARLMAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 23-15059 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion to reconsider. Deficiencies: None. Not dated. [12673913] (RL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and BRIDGET S. BADE) This appeal is from the denial of appellants post-judgment motion to reopen and for production of documents. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); United States v. Winkles, 795 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2015); Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (order). All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12671971] (ABT) [Entered: 03/10/2023 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Matthew Houston addendum to motion for reconsideration. Not dated. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12661086] (RL) [Entered: 02/24/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Matthew Houston motion for reconsideration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12650579] (RL) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/04/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12633564] (JMR) [Entered: 01/19/2023 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
