Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
| AMMAR HARRIS |
| ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., MICHAEL MINEV, WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM REUBART, DAVID DRUMMOND, P. HERNANDEZ, DANA COLE, BOYD, Mr., CALVIN JOHNSON, F. DREESEN, GREGORY BRYAN and STATE OF NEVADA |
| NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 23-15466 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ammar Harris FORM 28 reply to appellee reply to response to order to show cause. Served on 05/07/2023 [12715115] (RL) [Entered: 05/12/2023 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellee NDOC reply to response to order to show cause dated 03/31/2023. Date of service: 05/01/2023. [12706072] [23-15466] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 05/01/2023 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Ammar Harris motion to consolidate. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/16/2023. [12699827] (RL) [Entered: 04/20/2023 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ammar Harris response to order to show cause. Served on 04/16/2023. [12699818] (RL) [Entered: 04/20/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Kayla Dianna Dorame in 23-15466 substituted by Attorney Chris Davis in 23-15466 [12696975] (QDL) [Entered: 04/17/2023 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Chris William Davis (State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101) for Appellee NDOC. Substitution for Attorney Kayla Dianna Dorame for Appellee NDOC. Date of service: 04/17/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12696881] [23-15466] (Davis, Chris) [Entered: 04/17/2023 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): The notice of appeal dated March 21, 2023 and filed in the district court on March 29, 2023 seeks to challenge the portion of the district courts December 27, 2022 order denying appellants motions for a preliminary injunction. A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 29, 2023 notice of appeal was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after entry of the district courts December 27, 2022 order. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988) (notice of appeal deemed filed when it was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The court will set a briefing schedule, if necessary, after disposition of this order to show cause. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3. [12686663] (CKP) [Entered: 03/31/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12684421] (RT) [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
