Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN E. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee: PRICE, PARSONS, WALLS, BELL, DEN DULK, R. MARQUEZ, G. NIES, C. GAMBLE, JOSEPH BEASLEY, C. HAMMOND, J. A. ZAMORA and K. POOL
Case Number: 23-15663
Filed: May 3, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Filing 19 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion requesting the court issue a writ of mandamus to the defendants CMF, CDCR, and the state of California for cause. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/13/2023. [12742586] (RL) [Entered: 06/26/2023 09:41 AM]
June 23, 2023 Filing 18 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore addendum to FORM 4 motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 05/27/2023. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12742577] (RL) [Entered: 06/26/2023 09:39 AM]
June 23, 2023 Filing 17 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion to request an extension of time for compliance with the court's order filed June 2, 2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/14/2023. [12742576] (RL) [Entered: 06/26/2023 09:38 AM]
June 22, 2023 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore addendum to FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 05/27/2023. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12741041] (RL) [Entered: 06/22/2023 11:32 AM]
June 21, 2023 Filing 15 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion of inquiry. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/13/2023. [12740415] (RL) [Entered: 06/21/2023 02:56 PM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 14 Attorney Tiffany Johnson substituted by Attorney Daniel Mark Jackson. [12731245] (RL) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:45 PM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Mark Jackson (California Office of the Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102) for Appellees Bell, Parsons and Walls. Substitution for Attorney Mrs. Tiffany Johnson for Appellees Bell, Parsons and Walls. Date of service: 06/07/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12731152] [23-15663] (Jackson, Daniel) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:14 PM]
June 6, 2023 Filing 12 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 06-06-2023. [12730150] (JR) [Entered: 06/06/2023 03:09 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore FORM 29 request for docket sheet and rules book. Dated 05/27/2023. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12730009] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:21 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 10 Received notice of change of address dated 05/27/2023 from Kevin E. Moore. New address: J-77960, California Medical Facility, 1600 California Drive, R-103-L, PO Box 2500, Vacaville, CA 95696. [12729988] --[Edited: Updated Address. 06/06/2023 by TYL] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:14 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore letter dated 05/27/2023 re: Issues on appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12729984] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:12 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore motion of default judgment; declaration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/15/2022. [12729975] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:11 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/27/2023. [12729969] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:08 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kevin E. Moore FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/27/2023. [12729964] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:07 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 5 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Kevin E. Moore opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 05/27/2023. [12728915] (KT) [Entered: 06/05/2023 02:46 PM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): On May 3, 2023, this court issued an order directing appellant to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant has not yet complied with the courts May 3, 2023 order. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant must pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or submit to this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The Clerk will send appellant a Form 4 financial affidavit. [12727515] (CKP) [Entered: 06/02/2023 12:32 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12708357] (CKP) [Entered: 05/03/2023 03:30 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-15663: Due] ). [12708351] (CKP) [Entered: 05/03/2023 03:28 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin E. Moore opening brief due 06/27/2023. Appellees Joseph Beasley, Bell, Den Dulk, C. Gamble, C. Hammond, R. Marquez, G. Nies, Parsons, K. Pool, Price, Walls and J. A. Zamora answering brief due 07/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12708163] (ABT) [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN E. MOORE
Represented By: Kevin E. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PRICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PARSONS
Represented By: Tiffany Johnson
Represented By: Daniel Mark Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WALLS
Represented By: Tiffany Johnson
Represented By: Daniel Mark Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BELL
Represented By: Tiffany Johnson
Represented By: Daniel Mark Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEN DULK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: R. MARQUEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: G. NIES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. GAMBLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH BEASLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. HAMMOND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. A. ZAMORA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: K. POOL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?