Frankie Weisner v. L. Salinas, et al
| FRANKIE J. WEISNER |
| L. SALINAS, H. ANDRODE, P. MCDONALD, S. BALLI, S. HANDLEY and K. BINNING |
| 23-15840 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, RDN and PJB) [12759285] (RL) [Entered: 07/21/2023 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Frankie J. Weisner motion to correct spelling error. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12749377] (JFF) [Entered: 07/05/2023 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, RYAN D. NELSON and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district courts April 13, 2023 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12745700] (WL) [Entered: 06/29/2023 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12731906] (JFF) [Entered: 06/08/2023 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Frankie J. Weisner opening brief due 08/01/2023. Appellees H. Androde, S. Balli, K. Binning, S. Handley, P. Mcdonald and L. Salinas answering brief due 08/31/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12729071] ] (ABT) [Entered: 06/05/2023 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
