Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13496
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McDonald v. Batesville School District et al
as 3:2026cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ginni McDonald
Defendant:
Batesville School District and Scott Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Wilson v. Fitch et al
as 3:2026cv00553
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney General Lynn Fitch, Judge Barnes, Judge McDonald and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. LIVE URGENT CARE LLC
as 3:2026cv09547
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND MCDONALD
Defendant:
LIVE URGENT CARE LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dustin McDonald v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2026cv08374
Plaintiff:
Dustin McDonald
Defendant:
Sanchez, J. Motoike, Motoike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. McDonald
as 6:2026cv03072
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Delaney v. Longbar Grinding Inc et al
as 3:2026cv07759
Plaintiff:
Andrew Delaney
Defendant:
Longbar Grinding Inc, Brian J Smith and Jere E. McDonald, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis v. Gubster et al
as 1:2026cv08841
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Brian Davis
Defendant:
Jane Gubster, Thomas Dart, Collins and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13382
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
