D.T., et al v. Tahoma School District
| D.T. and J.H., parents of minor student J.T |
| TAHOMA SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| 23-35410 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights - Education |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court. [12753303] (AF) [Entered: 07/11/2023 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants D.T. and J.H. Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 06/21/2023. [12740558] [23-35410] (Hruska, Lara) [Entered: 06/21/2023 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Francis Chase Bonwell for party(s) Appellee Tahoma School District, in case 23-35410. [12738039] (NAC) [Entered: 06/16/2023 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of F. Chase Bonwell (Porter Foster Rorick LLP) for Appellee Tahoma School District. Date of service: 06/16/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12737957] [23-35410] (Bonwell, Francis) [Entered: 06/16/2023 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants D.T. and J.H. Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/21/2023. Appellants D.T. and J.H. opening brief due 08/14/2023. Appellee Tahoma School District answering brief due 09/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12735643] (JBS) [Entered: 06/14/2023 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
