Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Telfer et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv10137
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Telfer, Roy Telfer, Dreyden Telfer and others
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC, Southeast Housing, LLC, Balfour Beatty Military Housing Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hight v. Sayre et al
as 2:2026cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hanson Hight
Defendant:
PTLM D.T. Sayre and PTLM D.M. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Samantha Stinson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 26-1722
Plaintiff:
Samantha Stinson, on behalf of herself and her minor children, A.R.S. and A.W.S., Jonathan Stinson, on behalf of himself and his minor children, A.R.S. and A.W.S., Stephen Caldwell, on behalf of himself and his minor child, W.C. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, AL et al
as 1:2025cv00724
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, AL, Reese McKinney and D.T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christine Benson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-3311
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv09170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Julee Jaeger, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2894
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Samantha Stinson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2713
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Conway School District, No. 1, Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Gladden v. Holland et al
as 9:2025cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Gladden
Defendant:
D.T. Serena Holland, Wesley Waggonner and Layne Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladden v. Holland et al ***Transferred to Lufkin Division***
as 6:2025cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Gladden
Defendant:
D.T. Serena Holland, Wesley Waggonner and Layne Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
