White v. Hager, et al.
| TONEY A. WHITE |
| LARRY HALL, CHARLES DANIELS, ERIC LOPEZ, JENNIFER NASH, CALVIN JOHNSON, RYAN CLAY, THERESA WICKHAM, HOLLY CROSBY, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, LARRY DEAN WILLIAMSON, JACQUES GRAHAM, MANUEL PORTILLO, MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKETT, ROBERT OWENS, ROBIN HAGER, RASHEED CURRY, JEREMY BEAN, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, RIO MANALANG, BOB FAULKNER, RADEK DVORAK, G. CARPENTER, GREGORY BRYAN, MICHAEL MINEV, RHYS LIM, SCOTT MATTINSON, SIA ASIMIDAKIS, NAPHCARE, INC. and TED HANF |
| 24-6836 |
| November 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The court has received the responses to the November 14, 2025 order. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (a notice of appeal must be filed within the mandatory and jurisdictional deadline in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)); 28 U.S.C. 2107; Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 advisory committees note (2002) (Appeal time should start to run when the collateral order is entered without regard to creation of a separate document and without awaiting expiration of the 150 days provided by Rule 58(b)(2).). The opening brief is due January 29, 2025. The answering brief is due February 28, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/18/2024 04:42 PM]
|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 9) filed by Appellee Toney A. White. [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 3) filed by Appellant Robin Hager. [Entered: 12/05/2024 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Robin Hager. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/19/2024 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Samuel Pezone representing Appellant Robin Hager. [Entered: 11/15/2024 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Chris Davis [Entered: 11/15/2024 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chris Davis for Appellant Robin Hager replacing Samuel Pezone. [Entered: 11/15/2024 06:20 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A notice of appeal must be filed within the mandatory and jurisdictional deadline in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1). See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007); 28 U.S.C. 2107. This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal, because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the district courts September 29, 2024 order. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a statement explaining why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. If appellant does not comply with this order, the court will dismiss this appeal. See Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. If appellant files a statement, a response may be filed within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 11/14/2024 09:53 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/18/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/29/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/30/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/29/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/28/2025. For appeal no. 24-6836, 2:21-cv-01259-RFB-MDC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/12/2024 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-01259-RFB-MDC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6836 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/12/2024 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
