Martinez v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
| ESTEBAN MARTINEZ |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES |
| PONCE, MARGARITO CASTILLO MEDINA, RAMIREZ, AMBER BARRAZA, JOSE DAVID ELIZONDO, SANTIAGO, OFFICER PONCE, OFFICER SANTIAGO, JESUS VALLE, URBANO VEJIGA, J. MARTINEZ, EDDIE VEA, SANTA MARIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALEXANDER SILVA, MARC SCHNEIDER, RICARDO ARIAS, STEVEN MOELLER, FRANCO PAZ, CELINA MEDINA, DANIEL MARTINEZ, PHIL HANSEN, WILSON, GUILLERMINA ELIZONDO MUNOZ, JOSE SIXTO, MARIA SIXTO, CAIN SIXTO, GUILLERMO SILVA, TINA MCCOY, JODINE, JDX PHARMACY, ARIAN MUHAMMAD, ROSEMARY OVERA, GIA OWENS, DOES 1-1000, IN RE THE MATTERS FOR THE ESTATES LOTS OF JOSE D. ELIZONDO GUILLERMINA M. ELIZONDO 967 WEST BUNNY AVENUE and CITY OF SANTA MARIA |
| 24-7619 |
| December 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. (Richard A. PAEZ, Jay S. BYBEE, Eric D. MILLER) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners appeal of the district courts judgment is pending in case No. 25-202. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case No. 24-7619. DENIED. [Entered: 01/23/2025 02:38 PM]
|
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 12/30/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 12/18/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 12/18/2024 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/16/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7619 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 12/18/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 12/18/2024 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.