Cases 1 - 10 of 8,502
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Garcia et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv02823
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Marcus Santiago and Shirley Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alcala et al v. Mason et al
as 5:2024cv02585
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 25, San Bernardino County Board of Supervisor and Ensen Mason
Plaintiff:
Maria Santiago and Diaz Jesus Alcala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Anthony Murdock, et al v. City of Chicago
as 24-3208
Plaintiff:
THERESA KENNEDY, ANTHONY MURDOCK, SANTIAGO BRAVO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Krystal Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rivera v. Papoosha et al
as 3:2024cv01929
Defendant:
Concepcion, Papoosha, Guadarama and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yang v. Roper et al
as 3:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Siyu Yang
Defendant:
Jonathan Sanford, Matthias Vorwerk, Gregory Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
US v. Santiago-Colon
as 24-2096
Interested Party:
VICTIM C.Q.M, VICTIM J.A.T.V and VICTIM K.L.Q.R
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
NELSON SANTIAGO-COLON
Parra-Vargas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-7271
Petitioner:
IAN SANTIAGO PARRA-VARGAS, JOEL ESTEBAN PARRA-VARGAS, ANGIE PAOLA VARGAS-ROJAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago v. Benhoussa et al
as 7:2024cv09193
Defendant:
G Arnautu Express Incorporated and Yassir Benhoussa
Plaintiff:
Peter Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
