Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Santiago Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bulldog National Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. All Points 360, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Bulldog National Risk Retention Group, Inc. f/k/a American Transportation Group Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Bulldog National Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant:
All Points 360, LLC, Kedrin Harris, Laura Pecina Lopez, individually and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez-Figueroa v. Borne et al
as 5:2023ct03129
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rodriguez-Figueroa
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Borne, C/O Moneymaker, C/O Deane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BALLESTEROS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
JOSE ANGEL DE SANTIAGO BALLESTEROS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
STREET v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
LOMMIA FAYE STREET
Defendant:
JOHN SANTIAGO, TRAVIS J NELLIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pacheco v. North Carolina
as 5:2020hc02223
Respondent:
North Carolina
Petitioner:
Santiago A. Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANTIAGO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00903
Petitioner:
DESMONTE ANTWAIN SANTIAGO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
