Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 885
Santiago v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00751
Plaintiff: Zuleyka Santiago
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evelin Santiago, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1813
Petitioner: EVELIN CALIXTO SANTIAGO, B. C. G.C. and J. J. G.C.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SANTIAGO v. US BUS DEPOT LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05662
Plaintiff: LUZ SANTIAGO
Defendant: US BUS DEPOT LLC, JIAN Q. ZHU, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff: KEITH DAVIS
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1620
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
ULLOA GOMEZ et al v. GIRGIS
as 3:2024cv04602
Plaintiff: RUDDY ULLOA GOMEZ and SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant: MONA N. GIRGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ULLOA GOMEZ et al v. GIRGIS
as 2:2024cv04602
Plaintiff: RUDDY ULLOA GOMEZ and SANTIAGO GOMEZ
Defendant: MONA N. GIRGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ivan McKinney v. Talia Ryan, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff: IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant: TALIA RUBEL RYAN, REBECCA SANTIAGO, WILLIAM LEONARD and others
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff: IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant: SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?