Moten v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
| SHARROD MOTEN |
| PEDRO PULIDO, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DAVID O. CARTER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Magistrate Judge SHERI PYM, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, Magistrate Judge PAUL L. ABRAMS, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, Defense Attorney LISA GIARRATANO, Mr. SALCEDO, AIMS Division For CDCR Lt, R. OCHOA, Correctional Lieutenant, GALSHAN, JASMINE MCDUFFY, Correctional Oicer, Padro Pulido, MILLER, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, LAC-CSP REGIONAL HEALTH CARE EXECUTIVES, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, ROSAS, GREEN, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, GAREN SHAMIRIAN, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, GOP ACEVEDO, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, MAGNUM, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, LT. PEREZ, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, WERNER, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, D. MELO, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Sgt. ESPARZA, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, PACKARD, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, TORRES, LAC-CSP Transportation Correctional Officer, BATREZ, LAC-CSP Transportation Correctional Officer, RAYBON JOHNSON, LAC-CSP Transportation Correctional Officer, Mr. CASTILLO, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Mr. C. URRUTIA, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Mr. DIAZ, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Mr. MIRANDA, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Mr. CARDINEZ, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, Mr. FERNANDEZ, KVSP, Correctional Officer, Ms. VENTURA, DUARTE, FLORES, Control Booth Officer, Mr. ANGULO, Control Booth Officer, VALENZUELA, Control Booth Officer, GODINEZ, Control Booth Officer, Mr. GURROLA, Correctional Sgt. PANTOJA, VEITH, UNKNOWN HERNANDEZ, MONTEZ, KVSP, Correctional Lieutenant, DOES, 1- 10, Moreover, CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, MOUA, KVSP Correctional Officer, Sgt. RACHEL, Sgt. O'MALLEY, Warden THERESA CISNEROS, SATF, CELIA BELL, CEO Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, All KVSP personnel nonetheless and UNKNOWN PARTY 2, KVSP SATF Corcoran, furthermore all worked under the color of law for CDCR, accept judges and clerks. |
| 25-1931 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT. The judgment of this Court, entered 8/28/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 10/20/2025 09:55 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT) After reviewing the opening brief and appellants response to the May 13, 2025 order, we conclude that the district court correctly concluded that appellant filed three or more prior actions or appeals that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. See Moten v. Abrams, et al., No. 23-2493 (9th Cir. Jan. 17, 2024) (appeal dismissed as frivolous); Moten v. Calderon, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02595-DOC-SP (C.D. Cal. May 31, 2023) (dismissed for failure to state a claim); Moten v. Phiefer, et al., No. 2:23-cv-06355-DOC-SP (C.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2023) (dismissed for failure to state a claim). The district court also correctly concluded that appellant did not sufficiently allege imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing the complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district courts July 30, 2024 order denying appellants request to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied as moot. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 08/28/2025 03:39 PM]
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 7) filed by Appellant Sharrod Moten. [Entered: 06/11/2025 09:51 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 05/13/2025 04:52 PM]
|
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Sharrod Moten is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Sharrod Moten. [Entered: 04/10/2025 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Sharrod Moten. [Entered: 04/09/2025 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Sharrod Moten. [Entered: 04/08/2025 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/5/2025. For appeal no. 25-1931, 2:24-cv-05942-HDV. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-05942-HDV has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1931 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.