Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
MacGregor v. Leelanau, County of et al
as 1:2026cv00245
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenneth MacGregor
Defendant:
Leelanau, County of, Grand Traverse, County of, Antrim, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ford v. Jackson et al
as 3:2026cv03004
Plaintiff:
Randall E Ford
Defendant:
Amy L Jackson, Marjorie A Bryant, Thomas L Veith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chriest v. Tack et al
as 3:2025cv50536
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Chriest
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, L. Wilken, Nicole Benitez and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Piper v. Michael Veith
as 25-3070
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PIPER
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, Secuirty Therapeutic Aid 1
Knight v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2025cv03280
Plaintiff:
Meaka Anne Knight
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Andy Ezard, . Hass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Veith et al
as 2:2025cv01275
Plaintiff:
Daronte Brown
Defendant:
Robert Veith, Christopher Radaci, Orlando Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Moten v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 25-1931
Defendant:
PEDRO PULIDO, LAC-CSP Correctional Officer, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DAVID O. CARTER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff:
SHARROD MOTEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
