Puckett v. Liu, et al.
| DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT |
| H. LIU, Captain, DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, California State Prison, Sacramento, GREG HAMPTON, Lieutenant, California State Prison, Sacramento, WALKER, STEVEN BARTLETT, DANIEL DILLON, STEPHEN C. LEATHERMAN, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, ROGER K. LYNCH, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, CHARLES PIERCE, KESELOF, CAMERON REIF, CHAD J. RICHARDS, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, LANCE N. SCHROEDER, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, CHAD P. SEELY, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, BLAKE O'CONNELL, Psychiatric Technician, California State Prison, Sacramento, CARUTHERS, Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, BENJAMIN SMITH, BRIAN TILLO, AMILIA HICKS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, HENDERSON and M. VOONG, Chief of Appeals |
| 25-2538 |
| April 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH [Entered: 06/18/2025 09:51 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. (William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH) The notice of appeal was not delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district court entered the judgment on March 23, 2022 or the post-judgment order on January 21, 2025. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Hollywood v. City of Santa Maria, 886 F.2d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 1989) (no separate judgment required for order denying post-judgment motion; time to appeal begins to run from entry of order denying post-judgment motion); see also Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) (notice of appeal deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). This appeal is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/27/2025 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Durrell Anthony Puckett. [Entered: 05/07/2025 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Durrell Anthony Puckett. [Entered: 05/07/2025 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Durrell Anthony Puckett. [Entered: 05/07/2025 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Virginia I. Papan, representing Appellee Amilia Hicks, Appellee Benjamin Smith, Appellee Brian Tillo, Appellee Cameron Reif, Appellee Charles Pierce, Appellee Daniel Dillon, Appellee Greg Hampton, Appellee Keselof, Appellee Steven Bartlett, Appellee Walker. [Entered: 04/25/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Marisa Kirschenbauer [Entered: 04/25/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marisa Kirschenbauer for Appellee Amilia Hicks, Appellee Benjamin Smith, Appellee Brian Tillo, Appellee Cameron Reif, Appellee Charles Pierce, Appellee Daniel Dillon, Appellee Greg Hampton, Appellee Keselof, Appellee Steven Bartlett, Appellee Walker replacing Virginia I. Papan. [Entered: 04/25/2025 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/30/2025. For appeal no. 25-2538, 2:19-cv-02437-TLN-CKD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/21/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:19-cv-02437-TLN-CKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2538 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/21/2025 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
