Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Henderson v. Lane County Developmental Disability Services et al
as 6:2026cv01916
Plaintiff:
Christine Henderson
Defendant:
Lane County Developmental Disability Services, Allison Davis, Anthony Kincaid and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henderson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04387
Plaintiff:
Lenonard Henderson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
HENDERSON v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2026cv07074
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA HENDERSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Strong, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Marion County Government et al
as 1:2026cv00258
Plaintiff:
Nathan Arlo Gilliam
Defendant:
Marion County Government, Doug Moby Henderson, Lee Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eriksson et al v. City of Oregon City et al
as 3:2026cv01885
Plaintiff:
Annika Eriksson and Donald Buckhout
Defendant:
City of Oregon City, Tony Konkol, Todd Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11073
Plaintiff:
Christopher Henderson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Henderson et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv01261
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Henderson and Kevin S. Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Antonucci v. Lucas et al
as 8:2026cv02572
Plaintiff:
Sergio Antonucci
Defendant:
Michael T. Lucas, James D. Henderson Jr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
