Cases 1 - 10 of 660
Henderson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Javaris R. Henderson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Javonte Henderson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Uwazurike et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eyioma Uwazurike, Noah Shannon, Nelson Brands and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Alonzo Henderson
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alonzo Henderson
Henderson v. Shiv Hospitality Group Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sharon Henderson
Defendant:
Shiv Hospitality Group Inc and Praful Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. The City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lamar Allan Johnson
Defendant:
The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Joseph Nickerson, Clyde Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
