Cases 1 - 10 of 995
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Henderson Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Henderson
as 4:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Buckley v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Not Yet Classified:
Tasha Carver
Plaintiff:
Dameion Buckley
Defendant:
Henderson County and Zachary Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (JRG3)
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Howard Henderson, Jr
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert Henderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Newton et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Antionette Allen
Defendant:
Byron Zebedee Newton, Samuel Maxine Henderson and Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
