City and County of San Francisco, et al. v. Trump, et al.
| CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CITY OF PORTLAND, CITY OF NEW HAVEN, CITY OF OAKLAND, CITY OF EMERYVILLE, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CITY OF SEATTLE, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF SAN JOSE, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF SAINT PAUL, CITY OF SANTA FE and COUNTY OF KING |
| DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, EMIL BOVE, Acting Deputy Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS and IMMIGRANT DEFENDERS LAW CENTER |
| BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFITS, CALIFORNIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION, COMMUNITY BRIDGES, SAN FRANCISCO IMMIGRANT LEGAL & EDUCATION NETWORK, SAN FRANCISCO INTERFAITH COUNCIL, SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE |
| 25-3889 |
| June 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 52 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 12/09/2025 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 51 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Marsha S. BERZON, Ryan D. NELSON, Daniel P. COLLINS. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 12/05/2025 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, December 5, 2025 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-3889] [Entered: 12/01/2025 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 49 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Karun Tilak for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 11/26/2025 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 48 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, December 5, 2025 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-3889] [Entered: 11/20/2025 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 47 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Karun Tilak for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 3 in San Francisco, on 12/5/2025 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 46 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/13/2025 05:45 PM] |
| Filing 45 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Naomi Tsu [Entered: 11/12/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 44 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Daniel Tenny for Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 3 in San Francisco, on 12/5/2025 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: [-]. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 11/12/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 43 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Naomi Tsu for Appellee City of Minneapolis, Appellee City of New Haven, Appellee City of Portland, Appellee City of Saint Paul, Appellee City of Santa Fe, Appellee City of Seattle. [Entered: 11/12/2025 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 42 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Joshua Paul Waldman, representing Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security, Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 11/04/2025 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 41 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Joshua Paul Waldman. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 11/04/2025 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 40 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 34 by Immigration Reform Law Institut is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 10/29/2025 07:43 AM] |
Filing 39
ORDER FILED. Per the unanimous opinion of the court, the Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Brief (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED. [Entered: 10/28/2025 01:03 PM]
|
| Filing 38 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security received. [Entered: 09/23/2025 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 37 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Rajiv Narayan [Entered: 09/22/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 36 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rajiv Narayan for Appellee Central American Resource Center, Appellee City and County of San Francisco, Appellee City of Emeryville, Appellee City of Minneapolis, Appellee City of New Haven, Appellee City of Oakland, Appellee City of Portland, Appellee City of Sacramento, Appellee City of Saint Paul, Appellee City of San Diego, Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee City of Santa Cruz, Appellee City of Santa Fe, Appellee City of Seattle, Appellee Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, Appellee County of King, Appellee County of Monterey, Appellee County of Santa Clara, Appellee Immigrant Defenders Law Center. [Entered: 09/22/2025 10:47 AM] |
|
Filing 35
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 34 by Appellants is filed. Appellants must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 09/22/2025 08:33 AM]
|
| Filing 34 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 09/22/2025 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 33 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, December 5, 2025 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-3889] [Entered: 09/21/2025 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 32 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for December 2025 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [25-3889] [Entered: 09/08/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 31 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 28) for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The optional reply brief is due September 22, 2025. [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 30 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellees City and County of San Francisco, et al received. [Entered: 08/27/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 29 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 4 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 21 by Appellees City and County of San Francisco, et al received. [Entered: 08/27/2025 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 28 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 08/27/2025 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 27 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 26 by Behavioral Health Contractors Association, et al. is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 08/26/2025 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 25 ADDED Amicus Curiae Behavioral Health Contractors Association, Amicus Curiae California Association of Nonprofits, Amicus Curiae California Behavioral Health Organization, Amicus Curiae Community Bridges, Amicus Curiae San Francisco Immigrant Legal & Education Network, Amicus Curiae San Francisco Interfaith Council, Amicus Curiae Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits, Counsel for Amicus Curiae Audrey J. Mott-Smith [Entered: 08/26/2025 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 26 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Behavioral Health Contractors Association, California Association of Nonprofits, California Behavioral Health Organization, Community Bridges, San Francisco Immigrant Legal & Education Network, San Francisco Interfaith Council, and Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits.--[Court entered filing to correct DE 24] [Entered: 08/26/2025 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Behavioral Heal; CA Assoc.; CA Behavioral; Comm. Bridges; SF Immigrant; SF Interfaith; SV Council.--[Wrong filing type, has consent, correct DE is 26] [Entered: 08/25/2025 05:41 PM] [Edited: 08/26/2025 10:50 AM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellees City and County of San Francisco, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 21 by Appellees City and County of San Francisco, et al. are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/21/2025 10:28 AM]
|
| Filing 22 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 08/18/2025 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 21 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee City and County of San Francisco.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 8/21/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 08/18/2025 05:18 PM] [Edited: 08/21/2025 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 08/18/2025 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief (DE 17) filed by Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Amicus Curiae - Pending Immigration Reform Law Institute, Counsel for Amicus Curiae - Pending Jonathon Hauenschild [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 17 AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Immigration Reform Law Institute. [Entered: 07/28/2025 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 11 by Appellants received. [Entered: 07/24/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellants is received. [Entered: 07/24/2025 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Bill Nguyen [Entered: 07/23/2025 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bill Nguyen for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 07/23/2025 10:41 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellants is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 11 by Appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/21/2025 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 07/21/2025 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant United States of America, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 07/21/2025 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark Ankcorn for Appellee City of San Diego. [Entered: 07/14/2025 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Meredith Johnson [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meredith Johnson for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Daniel Tenny [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Tenny for Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security, Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 06/24/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Joshua Paul Waldman [Entered: 06/24/2025 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Paul Waldman for Appellant DOJ - United States Department of Justice, Appellant Donald J. Trump, Appellant Emil Bove, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant Pamela Bondi, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security, Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 06/24/2025 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/21/2025, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/18/2025. For appeal no. 25-3889, 3:25-cv-01350-WHO.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/23/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-01350-WHO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3889 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/23/2025 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
