Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
| ESTEBAN MARTINEZ |
| CITY OF SANTA MARIA, RICARDO ARIAS, RAMIREZ, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, DANIEL MARTINEZ, SANTA MARIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SANTIAGO, OFFICER SANTIAGO, PONCE, OFFICER PONCE, MARC SCHNEIDER, STEVEN MOELLER, MARGARITO CASTILLO MEDINA, ALEXANDER SILVA, AMBER BARRAZA, FRANCO PAZ, EDDIE VEA, WILSON, URBANO VEJIGA, CELINA MEDINA, J. MARTINEZ, GUILLERMINA ELIZONDO MUNOZ, JOSE DAVID ELIZONDO, JOSE SIXTO, MARIA SIXTO, CAIN SIXTO, GUILLERMO SILVA, TINA MCCOY, JODINE, JDX PHARMACY, ARIAN MUHAMMAD, ROSEMARY OVERA, GIA OWENS, DOES 1-1000 and IN RE THE MATTERS FOR THE ESTATES LOTS OF JOSE D. ELIZONDO GUILLERMINA M. ELIZONDO 967 WEST BUNNY AVENUE |
| 25-6460 |
| October 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief has been filed. Briefing is complete. [Entered: 01/29/2026 10:13 AM]
|
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Esteban Martinez is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Esteban Martinez. --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct party filer.] [Entered: 12/30/2025 11:43 AM] [Edited: 01/27/2026 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 12/15/2025 05:38 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 25, 2026. There is no appearance by appellees, so briefing will be complete when the opening brief is filed. [Entered: 11/28/2025 10:16 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 11/17/2025 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Esteban Martinez. [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings. [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/25/2025. For appeal no. 25-6460, 2:23-cv-06288-MWC-MAR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-06288-MWC-MAR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6460 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/14/2025 01:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.