Sternberg, et al. v. Hendrickson, et al.
| MICHAEL C. STERNBERG, E. W. and N. W. |
| Judge CINDY HENDRICKSON, BROOKE BLECHER, ROBERTA HAYASHI, THOMAS KUHNLE, BETH MCGOWAN, MARY GREENWOOD, PATRICIA GUERRERO, CHIEF JUSTICE, JULIE A. EMEDE, REBECCA FLEMING, SHERRY DIAMOND, SANTA CLARA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, ERICA DOERR, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, RUSSELL DAVIS, BRETT MOORE, CITY OF SAN JOSE, CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, THEODORE ZAYNER, CHARLES ADAMES, MAGDALENA CHATTOPADHYA, MAGDALENA LAW GROUP, GINA POLICASTRI, LONICH PATTON EHRLICH POLICASTRI, LEE STRAUS, JEFF ROSEN, JAY BOYARSKY, TRACY TEFERTILLER, MARIA GERSHENOVICH, ROB IMOBERSTEG, BRANDON STALLINGS, SCOTT KARPF, MELANIE DORIAN, DAVID AIGBOBOH, ARIANNA LE, DREW ARESCA, Dir. of Pub. Health SANDRA HERNANDEZ, CHELSEY SMITH and ARIANNA ADAMS |
| 25-7440 |
| November 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| STERNBERG, ET AL. V. HENDRICKSON, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Maren Clouse, representing Appellee City of San Jose. [Entered: 05/11/2026 02:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Maren Clouse. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 05/11/2026 01:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:51 AM]
|
|
Filing 24
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Kenneth K. LEE, Roopali H. DESAI, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE) The motion (Docket Entry No. 23) to file multiple reply briefs is granted. AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 22.] [Entered: 02/13/2026 02:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to File Replacement Brief filed by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 23.] [Entered: 02/13/2026 02:04 PM] [Edited: 02/13/2026 02:45 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [Entered: 02/10/2026 06:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [Entered: 02/10/2026 05:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 18 by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/10/2026 01:15 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [Entered: 02/10/2026 11:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 12 and Excerpts of Record at DE 16 by Appellees Cindy Hendrickson, et al. are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/20/2026 05:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Cindy Hendrickson, Appellee Brooke Blecher, Appellee Roberta Hayashi, Appellee Thomas Kuhnle, Appellee Beth McGowan, Appellee Mary Greenwood, Appellee Patricia Guerrero, Appellee Julie A. Emede, Appellee Rebecca Fleming, Appellee Theodore Zayner, Appellee Charles Adames. [Entered: 01/20/2026 04:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellee City of South Lake Tahoe is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 9 and Excerpts of Record at DE 10 by Appellees County of Santa Clara, et al. are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee City of South Lake Tahoe.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 11] [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Cindy Hendrickson, Appellee Brooke Blecher, Appellee Roberta Hayashi, Appellee Thomas Kuhnle, Appellee Beth McGowan, Appellee Mary Greenwood, Appellee Patricia Guerrero, Appellee Julie A. Emede, Appellee Rebecca Fleming, Appellee Theodore Zayner, Appellee Charles Adames. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:27 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee City of South Lake Tahoe.--[COURT UPDATE: Removed Form 34 (refiled correctly at DE 13)] [Entered: 01/20/2026 01:00 PM] [Edited: 01/20/2026 03:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Erica Doerr, Appellee County of Santa Clara, Appellee Russell Davis, Appellee Brett Moore, Appellee Jeff Rosen, Appellee Jay Boyarsky, Appellee Tracy Tefertiller, Appellee Maria Gershenovich, Appellee Rob Imobersteg. [Entered: 01/20/2026 09:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Erica Doerr, Appellee County of Santa Clara, Appellee Russell Davis, Appellee Brett Moore, Appellee Jeff Rosen, Appellee Jay Boyarsky, Appellee Tracy Tefertiller, Appellee Maria Gershenovich, Appellee Rob Imobersteg. [Entered: 01/20/2026 08:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) denied. Streamline extensions are not allowed for any brief filed in a Preliminary Injunction Appeal pursuant to CR 31-2.2(a)(3) . The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 12/29/2025 12:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Erica Doerr, Appellee County of Santa Clara, Appellee Russell Davis, Appellee Brett Moore, Appellee Jeff Rosen, Appellee Jay Boyarsky, Appellee Tracy Tefertiller, Appellee Maria Gershenovich, Appellee Rob Imobersteg. [Entered: 12/29/2025 10:11 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael C. Sternberg. [Entered: 12/23/2025 08:01 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ADDED Counsel for Appellee Brian Patrick Eggleston [Entered: 11/26/2025 10:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Patrick Eggleston for Appellee City of San Jose. [Entered: 11/26/2025 10:31 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/20/2026, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/23/2025. For appeal no. 25-7440, 3:24-cv-04271-AMO.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-04271-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7440 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:25 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
