United States of America v. Felix-Alvarez
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JESUS FELIX-ALVAREZ, Lil M and Junior
Case Number: 26-229
Filed: January 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2026 Filing 11 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 17, 2026. The answering brief is due August 17, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/17/2026 02:06 PM]
June 9, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jesus Felix-Alvarez. [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:27 AM]
May 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/17/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/17/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:18 AM]
May 18, 2026 Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jesus Felix-Alvarez. [Entered: 05/18/2026 07:30 AM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Craig H. Durham [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:39 AM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 6 CJA Counsel Appointment [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:37 AM]
February 6, 2026 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Richard Wayne Raynor, representing Appellant Jesus Felix-Alvarez. [Entered: 02/06/2026 09:49 AM]
February 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) by Richard W. Raynor to withdraw and to appoint new counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Within 14 days of identifying counsel, the appointing authority for the Central District of California is requested to send counsels contact information to [email protected]. Counsel must order the transcript by March 6, 2026. The transcript is due April 6, 2026. The opening brief is due May 18, 2026. The answering brief is due June 17, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel, the district court, and appellant individually. [Entered: 02/06/2026 09:43 AM]
January 15, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Richard Wayne Raynor for Appellant Jesus Felix-Alvarez. [Entered: 01/15/2026 03:16 PM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 120 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/26/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/25/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/6/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/6/2026. For appeal no. 26-229, 2:12-cr-00527-GW-3. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 01/13/2026 09:39 AM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:12-cr-00527-GW-3 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-229 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/13/2026 09:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Felix-Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JESUS FELIX-ALVAREZ
Represented By: Richard Wayne Raynor
Represented By: Craig H. Durham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lil M
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Junior
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A., Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Timothy James Searight
Represented By: Thomas James Magana
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin Robert Barron
Represented By: Mr. Alexander H. Tran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?