County of Santa Clara, et al. v. Noem, et al.
| COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF ALAMEDA, CITY OF BELLINGHAM, CITY OF BERKELEY, CITY OF CULVER CITY, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF MARIN, CITY OF OAKLAND, CITY OF PALO ALTO, CITY OF PASADENA, CITY OF PETALUMA, COUNTY OF PIERCE, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF SAN JOSE, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CITY OF SANTA ROSA, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, COUNTY OF SONOMA, SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, CITY OF TUCSON, LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY, SONOMA VALLEY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT and COUNTY OF KING |
| KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, DAVID RICHARDSON, in his official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of FEMA Administrator, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 26-402 |
| January 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Arnold F. Lee [Entered: 02/19/2026 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Arnold F. Lee for Appellee City of Pasadena. [Entered: 02/18/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 21 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sharanya Mohan, Counsel for Appellee Toby Merrill [Entered: 02/17/2026 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Toby Merrill for Appellee City of Alameda, Appellee City of Bellingham, Appellee City of Berkeley, Appellee City of Culver City, Appellee City of Oakland, Appellee City of Palo Alto, Appellee City of Pasadena, Appellee City of Petaluma, Appellee City of Sacramento, Appellee City of San Diego, Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee City of Santa Monica, Appellee City of Santa Rosa, Appellee City of Tucson, Appellee County of King, Appellee County of Los Angeles, Appellee County of Marin, Appellee County of Pierce, Appellee County of San Diego, Appellee County of San Mateo, Appellee County of Snohomish, Appellee County of Sonoma, Appellee Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District, Appellee Sonoma County Community Development Commission, Appellee Sonoma County Water Agency, Appellee Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District. [Entered: 02/17/2026 06:55 AM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sharanya Mohan for Appellee City of Alameda, Appellee City of Bellingham, Appellee City of Berkeley, Appellee City of Culver City, Appellee City of Oakland, Appellee City of Palo Alto, Appellee City of Pasadena, Appellee City of Petaluma, Appellee City of Sacramento, Appellee City of San Diego, Appellee City of San Jose, Appellee City of Santa Monica, Appellee City of Santa Rosa, Appellee City of Tucson, Appellee County of King, Appellee County of Los Angeles, Appellee County of Marin, Appellee County of Pierce, Appellee County of San Diego, Appellee County of San Mateo, Appellee County of Snohomish, Appellee County of Sonoma, Appellee Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District, Appellee Sonoma County Community Development Commission, Appellee Sonoma County Water Agency, Appellee Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District. [Entered: 02/17/2026 06:47 AM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Daniel Tenny [Entered: 01/30/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Tenny for Appellant David Richardson, Appellant Federal Emergency Management Agency, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 01/30/2026 11:09 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The joint motion (Docket Entry No. 15) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. Proceedings in this appeal are stayed pending issuance of the mandate in County of King, et al. v. Turner, et al. (No. 25-3664). [Entered: 01/30/2026 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant David Richardson, Appellant Federal Emergency Management Agency, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 01/29/2026 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hannah Mae Godbey for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 01/27/2026 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Raphael Rajendra for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 01/27/2026 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kavita Narayan for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 01/27/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meredith Johnson for Appellee County of Santa Clara. [Entered: 01/27/2026 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant David Richardson, Appellant Federal Emergency Management Agency, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/26/2026 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Yvonne Mere [Entered: 01/23/2026 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne Mere for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/23/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Sarah Nicole Smith [Entered: 01/23/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Steven Arthur Mills, Counsel for Appellee Tara Michelle Steeley [Entered: 01/23/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tara Michelle Steeley for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/23/2026 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven Arthur Mills for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/23/2026 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Nicole Smith for Appellant David Richardson, Appellant Federal Emergency Management Agency, Appellant Kristi Noem, Appellant United States Department of Homeland Security. [Entered: 01/23/2026 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/17/2026, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/17/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/26/2026. For appeal no. 26-402, 3:25-cv-08330-WHO.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/20/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-08330-WHO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-402 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
