Mendez v. County of Ada, et al.
| RAUL MENDEZ |
| COUNTY OF ADA, ADA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ADA COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE, ADA COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE, ADA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, ADA COUNTY TRASH BILLING SERVICES, SCOTT WILLIAMS, any other employees of the Ada County Billing Services, LYN CALL, any other employees of the Ada County Billing Services, AMMON TAYLOR, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE, AMANDA K. BRAILSFORD, DISTRICT JUDGE, DAVID C. NYE, DISTRICT JUDGE, B. LYNN WINMILL, DISTRICT JUDGE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. |
| 26-5645 |
| August 31, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. HURWITZ, VANDYKE, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 4, 2026 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a); Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order (TRO) is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); see also Grand Canyon Skywalk Develop., LLC v. Sa Nyu Wa Inc., 715 F.3d 1196, 1199-1200 (9th Cir. 2013) (Although TROs are not typically appealable interlocutory orders, we may review a TRO that possesses the qualities of a preliminary injunction where the district court holds an adversary hearing and the basis for the courts order was strongly challenged (internal quotes omitted)). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, [Entered: 09/25/2026 11:55 AM]
|
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Raul Mendez is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 09/25/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Raul Mendez. [Entered: 09/25/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Raul Mendez. [Entered: 09/25/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Raul Mendez. [Entered: 09/23/2026 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Raul Mendez. [Entered: 09/23/2026 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/28/2026. For appeal no. 26-5645, 1:26-cv-00351-BLW.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/31/2026 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:26-cv-00351-BLW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5645 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/31/2026 04:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
