NLRB v. Pallet Companies, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board |
Pallet Companies, Inc., a Subsidiary of IFCO Systems N.A., Inc. |
14-1220 |
October 30, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED to National Labor Relations Board [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 02/10/2016 12:24 PM] |
PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [1589286] filed (without memorandum) that the petition for review be denied and the Board's cross-application for enforcement be granted. (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Henderson, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 12/18/2015 08:45 AM] |
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Henderson, Griffith and Kavanaugh. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 12/10/2015 10:51 AM] |
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Milakshmi Rajapakse (REVISED FORM), on behalf of Respondent NLRB in 14-1182, Petitioner NLRB in 14-1220 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 12/04/2015 02:58 PM] |
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Ruth E. Burdick, on behalf of Respondent NLRB in 14-1182, Petitioner NLRB in 14-1220 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [14-1182, 14-1220] (Burdick, Ruth) [Entered: 12/02/2015 11:41 AM] |
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Joseph C. Devine, on behalf of Petitioner Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182, Respondent Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1220 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 12/01/2015 11:12 AM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [1585447] filed allocating oral argument time as follows: Petitioner - 10 Minutes, Respondent - 10 Minutes. One counsel per side to argue; directing party to file Form 72 notice of arguing attorney by 12/03/2015 [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 11/25/2015 11:57 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1580503] filed by Linda Dreeben and co-counsel Ruth E. Burdick on behalf of Respondent NLRB. [14-1182] (Burdick, Ruth) [Entered: 10/28/2015 12:38 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1576490] filed scheduling oral argument on Thursday, 12/10/2015. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 10/05/2015 12:42 PM] |
PETITIONER FINAL BRIEF [1545546] filed by Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182 [Service Date: 04/01/2015 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 04/01/2015 05:51 PM] |
PETITIONER FINAL REPLY BRIEF [1545547] filed by Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182 [Service Date: 04/01/2015 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 04/01/2015 05:53 PM] |
MODIFIED EVENT FROM FILED TO LODGED--SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX [1545176] filed by Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182, 14-1220. [Volumes: 1] [Service Date:03/31/2015 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 03/31/2015 01:37 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1545260] granting motion for leave to file [ # 1545174-2 ]; the Clerk is directed to file supplemental appendix [ # 1545176-2 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 03/31/2015 03:59 PM] |
PER ABOVE ORDER lodged appendix [ # 1545176-2 ] is filed [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 03/31/2015 04:01 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed [1545174] by Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182, 14-1220 for leave to file appendix [Service Date: 03/31/2015 ] Pages: 1-10. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 03/31/2015 01:35 PM] |
RESPONDENT FINAL BRIEF [1545149] filed by NLRB in 14-1182 [Service Date: 03/31/2015 ] Length of Brief: 9,764 Words. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 03/31/2015 12:55 PM] |
JOINT APPENDIX [1543124] filed by Pallet Companies, Inc. in 14-1182, 14-1220. [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 03/18/2015 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] (Devine, Joseph) [Entered: 03/18/2015 05:03 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1539360] granting petitioner's unopposed motion to extend time to file the reply brief [ # 1539018-2 ] The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: PETITIONER Reply Brief due 03/11/2015. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 03/18/2015. Final Briefs due 04/01/2015. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 02/24/2015 04:35 PM] |
RESPONDENT BRIEF [1537059] filed by NLRB in 14-1182 [Service Date: 02/11/2015 ] Length of Brief: 9,855 Words. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 02/11/2015 11:45 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1534639] granting respondent's unopposed motion to extend time [ # 1534243-2 ], The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: RESPONDENT Brief due on 02/11/2015. PETITIONER Reply Brief due 02/25/2015. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 03/04/2015. Final Briefs due 03/18/2015. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 01/28/2015 02:19 PM] |
CORRECTED UNOPPOSED MOTION filed [1534243] by NLRB in 14-1182, 14-1220 to extend time to file brief to 02/11/2015. [Service Date: 01/27/2015 ] Pages: 1-10. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 01/27/2015 10:17 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed [1534232] by NLRB in 14-1182, 14-1220 to extend time to file brief to 02/11/2015. [Service Date: 01/27/2015 ] Pages: 1-10. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 01/27/2015 09:46 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1531667] granting respondent's unopposed motion to extend time [ # 1531349-2 ], The following revised briefing schedule will now apply: RESPONDENT Brief due on 02/04/2015. PETITIONER Reply Brief due 02/18/2015. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 02/25/2015. Final Briefs due 03/11/2015. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 01/13/2015 11:29 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed [1531349] by NLRB in 14-1182, 14-1220 to extend time to file brief to 02/04/2015. [Service Date: 01/12/2015 ] Pages: 1-10. [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 01/12/2015 09:48 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1521797] setting briefing schedule: PETITIONER Brief due 12/22/2014. RESPONDENT Brief due on 01/21/2015. PETITIONER Reply Brief due 02/04/2015. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 02/11/2015. Final Briefs due 02/25/2015. [14-1182, 14-1220] [Entered: 11/12/2014 01:11 PM] |
CERTIFIED INDEX TO RECORD [1520353] filed by NLRB in 14-1182, 14-1220 [Service Date: 11/03/2014 ] [14-1182, 14-1220] (Dreeben, Linda) [Entered: 11/03/2014 03:03 PM] |
CERTIFIED COPY [1520009] of Cross-Application for Enforcement sent to respondent [ # 1520003-2 ] [14-1220, 14-1182]--[Edited 10/31/2014 by AY] (Accursio, John) [Entered: 10/31/2014 11:01 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER filed [1520016] consolidating cases as cross-appeals. [14-1220, 14-1182] (Accursio, John) [Entered: 10/31/2014 11:04 AM] |
CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT filed [1520003] by NLRB of a decision by federal agency [Service Date: 10/30/2014 ] [14-1220] (Accursio, John) [Entered: 10/31/2014 10:58 AM] |
CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT CASE docketed. [14-1220] (Accursio, John) [Entered: 10/31/2014 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: NLRB v. Pallet Companies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Pallet Companies, Inc., a Subsidiary of IFCO Systems N.A., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Joseph Charles Devine |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board | |
Represented By: | Linda Dreeben |
Represented By: | John H. Ferguson |
Represented By: | Ruth E. Burdick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.