USPS v. PRC
Petitioner: United States Postal Service
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc.
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: National Postal Policy Council, Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers, Association for Postal Commerce and MPA - The Association of Magazine Media
Case Number: 15-1297
Filed: August 28, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 15, 2016 Summary USPS v. PRC

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 1207874393 OPINION [1646009] filed (Pages: 11) for the Court by Judge Henderson. [15-1297]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USPS v. PRC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States Postal Service
Represented By: David Clifford Belt
Represented By: Stephan J. Boardman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Postal Regulatory Commission
Represented By: Daniel Tenny
Represented By: Michael S. Raab
Represented By: David Alan Trissell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant-intervenor for petitioner: Valpak Direct Marketing Systems, Inc.
Represented By: William Jeffery Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant-intervenor for respondent: National Postal Policy Council
Represented By: William B. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant-intervenor for respondent: Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers
Represented By: Matthew David Field
Represented By: David Matthew Levy
Represented By: Ian David Volner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant-intervenor for respondent: Association for Postal Commerce
Represented By: Matthew David Field
Represented By: David Matthew Levy
Represented By: Ian David Volner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant-intervenor for respondent: MPA - The Association of Magazine Media
Represented By: Matthew David Field
Represented By: David Matthew Levy
Represented By: Ian David Volner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?